Most recently, that effort includes a collection of blog essays on Neal's site and the Duke African American Studies site by noted and emerging writers including Wahneema Lubiano, Bryan Profitt, Dhasan Ahanu and Neal himself.
This morning, Neal spent a few minutes talking with me about the recent developments in the case, and the results he's seen so far from the efforts to have the larger conversation about understanding and ending sexual violence. In this first post, Neal talks about the ways in which race, class and sexual stereotypes have affected the media coverage of the case. He also comments on the fact that Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong, is being charged with pushing the case to get votes by his opponents in an upcoming primary re-election bid. Nifong is white; his opponents are a black man and a white woman. Neal suspects that indeed, Nifong might have been more aggressive in pursuing this case because it suited his political interests. His own interest, however, is to draw attention to the ongoing problem of rape,, and to challenge a culture that has, for centuries, discounted sexual violence against black women. Neal cited Erin Texeira's recent AP story, Duke Rape Scandal Reopens Old Wounds as an example of the kind of press coverage that he would like to see more frequently.
When Neal talks about these issues in his classes, he's been surprised by some of the turns the conversation has taken. For example, some of his black male student athletes protested former boxer Mike Tyson's rape conviction and three-year prison sentence."If we want to believe that Mike Tyson is not guilty, then no man who's convicted of rape is guilty," Neal argued. We also talked about the ways in which young men and women act out "notions of masculinity" that can sometimes result in sexual violence, as well as what he sees as the real challenge before the Duke University administration. To close, I asked Neal a personal question -- when his two young daughters are young women, how does he hope the world will have changed?
As for the case itself, Rachel continues to keep up with the headlines and provoke lots of discussion.
(cross-posted at BlogHer)
/Duke University/,Crime,rape,black women,news
Note: As of July 3, 2009, only the RSS feeds on this blog will be updated so I can focus my energies on my 






3 comments:
Polygraph accuser
I am a lawyer in practice more than 30 years. I have followed the events of the Duke lacrosse allegations closely. As a member of the bar, I am aware of my ethical obligations to my clients, the courts, my adversaries, and the public. Lawyers living up to those obligations is an essential part of our justice system. Lawyers have an exalted standard of conduct -- this is what makes our system of justice unique in the world.
I am concerned that Mike Nifong is not meeting his ethical obligations as a member of the bar. Given the status of the investigation, Nifong should require the accuser to take a polygraph examination in order to test her credibility.
If she refused to take the test or failed it, the case should be closed immediately. Nifong should not allow this investigation to languish. He has an ethical duty to investigate this matter in good faith, unaffected by his own personal or political motivations.
If he refuses to take appropriate steps to conclude this matter, then the electorate should carefully consider whether it wants, as its district attorney, a person who is willing to conduct a witchhunt instead of a search for the truth.
It is simply unfathomable in our United States that a community such as Durham could have an "inquisitor" in office who could point the accusatory finger at any of us that could ruin our lives without any credible proof of criminality.
Anonymous,
Polygraph tests are inadmissable in court because they are unreliable. Should all victims of a crime be forced to take a polygraph test before charges are pressed?
The stripper has serious character flaws judging by her criminal pass:
• Stripper made a false claim of rape by three boys in 1996.
• Stripper made a false claim of kidnapping in 1998
• Stripper charged with larceny, auto theft, and trying to kill a police officer in 2002
The stripper’s account of the night has serious integrity issues:
• First she claimed 20 boys raped her, then she narrowed it down to 3 in a bathroom
o The bathroom is absolutely and completely devoid of any evidence of a rape. Where is her DNA? Urine, blood, vaginal fluid, saliva, or tears?
o Many people’s DNA were found under her nails but none from the innocent lacrosse boys.
o She lied about losing her fake finger nails in a desperate struggle in the small enclosed bathroom, but pictures show that she removed her nails before inadequately performing her routine. No scratches were found on any of the innocent lacrosse boys’ bodies.
o The 2 innocent boys she “eeny meeny miney moed” to be her rapists weren’t even at the party the time she claimed the rape occurred. She claims that she’s 100% sure, but she told her father that she’s not sure.
o She took drugs before coming to the house, something illegal.
• The 2nd stripper stated that she doubted that a rape occurred, but changed her story after given a deal by DA Nifong, then contact a PR firm to “spin this scandal to her advantage.”
The stripper obviously lied, and she’s putting these innocent boys and families through hell. She deserves to be in prison for the rest of her pathetic life. She is worthless as a person and human being. Her one lie destroyed innocent boys. I hope her and Nifong’s aura catches up to them and they get what they deserve. I hope everyone wishing this rape claim to be true, in spite of all the evidence that it never occurred, gets what’s coming to them.
Post a Comment